Previous Page  11 / 14 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 11 / 14 Next Page
Page Background

Инновационная методика расчета и проектирования камеры сгорания…

Инженерный журнал: наука и инновации

# 12·2016 11

Innovative methodology for calculation and design

of liquid-propellant rocket engine combustion chamber

© O.V. Korotkaya

Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia

The methodology for mathematical modeling which makes it possible to perform calcula-

tions and design of liquid-propellant rocket engine combustion chambers, minimizing the

number of bench tests, has been proposed in this article. Nowadays the numerous fire

tests are the basic methods to test the strength of the combustion chambers. By combining

a number of software packages (ANSYS, pSeven) the developed methodology enables us

not only to perform a checking calculation but to design an optimal structure as well. We

describe a step-by-step sequence of actions. Moreover, we give some recommendations

for a calculation of a LPRE combustion chamber on several operating modes in terms of

low-cycle fatigue. The proposed methodology has been approved while designing the

11D58MF cruise engine.

Keywords:

mathematical modeling, finite-element method, substructure, cyclic symmetry,

anisotropy coefficients, optimization, mode of deformation, nozzle, combustion chamber,

liquid-propellant rocket engine, cooling channels.

REFERENCES



Feodosyev V.I.

Prochnost kamery zhidkostnogo raketnogo dvigatelya

[The

strength of the liquid-propellant rocket engine combustion chamber]. Moscow,

Oborongiz Publ., 1957, 212 p.



Korotkaya O.V., Gavryushin S.S.

Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Mash-

inostroenie — Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Machine Build-

ing

, 2016, no. 1 (670), pp. 78–86. DOI: 10.18698/0536-1044-2016-1-78-86



Kuhl D., Riccius J., Haidn O.J. Thermomechanical Analysis and Optimization

of Cryogenic Liquid Rocket Engines.

Journal of Propulsion and Power

, July–

August 2002, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 835–846.



Sutton G.P., Biblarz O.

Rocket Propulsion Elements

. New York, John Wiley &

Sons, 2001, 751 p.



Naraghi M.H.N.

A Computer Code for Three-Dimensional Rocket Thermal

Evaluation

.New York, Tara Technologies, 2002, 106 p.



Naraghi M.H., Dunn S., Coats D. A Model for Design and Analysis of Regen-

eratively Cooled Rocket Engines.

AIAA-2004-3852, Joint Propulsion Confer-

ence, Fort Lauderdale

, 2004, 13 p.



Asraff A.K., Sunil S., Muthukumar R., Ramanathan T.J. Stress analysis & life

prediction of a cryogenic rocket engine thrust chamber considering low cycle

fatigue, creep and thermal ratchetting.

Transactions of the Indian Institute of

Metals

, April–June 2010, vol. 63, no. 2–3, pp. 601–606.



Babu A., Asraff A.K., Philip N. Fatigue life prediction of a rocket combustion

chamber.

IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IOSR-JMCE)

,

September–October 2014, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 12–20.



Asraff A.K., Sheela S., Eapen R.K., Babu A. Cyclic stress analysis of a rocket

engine thrust chamber using chaboche constitutive model.

Transactions of the

Indian Institute of Metals

, March 2016, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 495–500.