Engineering Journal: Science and InnovationELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PUBLICATION
Certificate of Registration Media number Эл #ФС77-53688 of 17 April 2013. ISSN 2308-6033. DOI 10.18698/2308-6033
  • Русский
  • Английский
Article

Multicriteria parametric optimization method for skinned-frame structures based on enhanced weighted TOPSIS method

Published: 24.01.2024

Authors: Wang Yizhou, Zuzov V.N.

Published in issue: #1(145)/2024

DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2024-1-2329

Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Ground transport and technological means and complexes

This paper presented a multicriteria parametric optimization method based on enhanced weighted TOPSIS method. The approach aimed to mitigate the impact of constraints in multicriteria parametric optimization, distinguishing itself from universal methods such as the direct method, response surface method, and traditional weighted TOPSIS method. This work focused on minimizing the computer time required for solving the complex problem of reducing the weight of frame-shell load-bearing structures while concurrently ensuring structural strength and rigidity. To enhance computational efficiency, the devised method incorporates an iterative process of the traditional weighted TOPSIS method integrated with a genetic algorithm. This integration seeks to mitigate the influence of criteria numbers and objective function weighting coefficients on the optimization outcome by utilizing numerical results from the weighted TOPSIS method. The need for recalculations is obviated through the utilization of a pre-established database containing computed individuals. Moreover, to mitigate the influence of population disparities on the optimization outcome, global extreme individuals are introduced to foster convergence. This systematic approach ensures both computational expediency and robust optimization results in the context of the genetic algorithm framework. The efficacy of the proposed methodology was evaluated through a comparative analysis of optimization outcomes achieved using the proposed approach and those derived from conventional methods applied to the Humdinga amphibious vehicle chassis. Upon analysis of the calculation results, it can be inferred that the proposed method facilitated a substantial reduction in structural weight, exemplified by the underbody panel exhibiting a mass 51% lower than that of the original design. In comparison with widely adopted methods for multicriteria parametric optimization, such as the direct method and the response surface method, a more pronounced reduction in body weight was achieved by the proposed method (44% for the direct method, and 42% for the response surface method). In contrast to the traditional weighted TOPSIS method, the proposed multicriteria parametric optimization method exhibited substantial decrease in computational time for solution attainment (75% reduction in computer time).


References
[1] Stepanov A.P. Proektirovanie amfibiynykh mashin [Design of amphibious vehicles]. Moscow, Megalion Publ., 2007, 420 p.
[2] Goncharov R.B., Zuzov V.N. Opredelenie kriteriev vybora parametrov materiala-napolnitelya v nesuschikh tonkostennykh konstruktsiyakh primenitelno k zadachyam passivnoy bezopasnosti avtomobiley [On criteria of selecting filler material in supporting thin-walled frame-type structures in relation to the tasks of cars and tractors passive safety]. Inzhenerny zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2019, iss. 4. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2019-4-1865
[3] Goncharov R.B., Zuzov V.N. Osobennosti poiska optimalnykh parametrov usiliteley zadney chasti kabiny gruzovogo avtomobilya na baze parametricheskoy i topologicheskoy optimizatsii s tselyu obespecheniya trebovaniya po passivnoy bezopasnosti po mezhdunarodnym pravilam i polucheniya ee minimalnoy massy [Special features of search of the optimal parameters of the amplifiers of a truck cabin rear part based on parametric and topological optimization in order to ensure the requirements for passive safety according to international rules and to obtain its minimum mass]. Trudy NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva — Transactions of NNSTU n.a. R.E. Alekseev, 2019, no. 2, pp. 163–170. https://doi.org/10.46960/1816-210X_2019_2_163
[4] Gunantara N. A review of multi-objective optimization: Methods and its applications. Cogent Engineering, 2018, vol. 5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2018.1502242
[5] Marler R.T., Arora J.S. The weighted sum method for multi-objective optimization: new insights. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 2010, vol. 41, pp. 853–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-009-0460-7
[6] Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C., Anderson-Cook C.M. Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons, 2016, 856 p.
[7] Vorobieva M.V. Analiz metodov mnogokriterialnogo prinyatiya resheniy [Analysis of methods of multi-criteria decision-making]. Regionalnaya i otraslevaya ekonomika — Regional and sectoral Economy, 2022, no. 1, pp. 24–28. https://doi.org/10.47576/2782-4578_2022_1_24
[8] Hwang C.L., Yoon K. Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey, 1981, vol. 186, pp. 58–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3
[9] Cho J.G., Koo J.S., Jung H.S. A lightweight design approach for an EMU car body using a material selection method and size optimization. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2016, vol. 30, pp. 673–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-016-0123-8
[10] Sheppard D. Amphibious Innovation: Engineering the Aquada. E.nz Magazine: The Magazine of Technical Enterprise, 2005, vol. 6, pp. 23–25. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.007323739318493
[11] Divinycell H. Excellent mechanical properties to low weight. Available at: https://www.diabgroup.com/products-services/divinycell-pvc/divinycell-h/ (accessed December 1, 2023).
[12] Huang Z., Li Y., Zhang X., Chen W., Fang D. A comparative study on the energy absorption mechanism of aluminum/CFRP hybrid beams under quasi-static and dynamic bending. Thin-Walled Structures, 2021, vol. 163, pp. 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tws.2021.107772
[13] Goncharov R.B., Zuzov V.N., Chayko D.N. Modelirovanie povedeniya tonkostennykh trub s raznymi napolnitelyami pri predelnom nagruzhenii primenitelno k resheniyu problem passivnoy bezopasnosti avtomobiley [Modeling the behavior of thin-walled pipes with different fillers under maximum load in solving the problems of crashworthiness]. Inzhenerny zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2019, iss. 3. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2019-3-1856
[14] Wang Y. K voprosu o nakhozhdenii ekstremalnykh rezhimov nagruzheniy amfibiynykh mashin pri ekspluatatsii v vodnoy srede [Research on extreme load mode of amphibious vehicle during operation on water]. Trudy NGTU im. R.E. Alekseeva — Transactions of NNSTU n.a. R.E. Alekseev, 2023, no. 4, pp. 82–96. https://doi.org/10.46960/1816-210X_2023_4_82
[15] Afanasyev B.A., Belousov B.N., Zheglov L.F. Proektirovanie polnoprivodnykh kolesnykh mashin. [Design of all-wheel-drive wheeled vehicles]. In 3 vols. Polungyan A.A., ed. Moscow, BMSTU Publ., 2008, 432 p.