Engineering Journal: Science and InnovationELECTRONIC SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING PUBLICATION
Certificate of Registration Media number Эл #ФС77-53688 of 17 April 2013. ISSN 2308-6033. DOI 10.18698/2308-6033
  • Русский
  • Английский
Article

Comparative analysis of numerical and approximate analytical solutions to the problem of piston acceleration in a pipe by compressed gas

Published: 11.02.2019

Authors: Bykov N.V.

Published in issue: #2(86)/2019

DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2019-2-1852

Category: Mechanics | Chapter: Mechanics of Liquid, Gas, and Plasma

The paper focuses on mathematical and numerical simulation of piston acceleration by compressed gas in a guide pipe, also known as Lagrange ballistic problem. We consider two approaches to an approximate analytical solution of the problem: the uniform deformation approximation, within which a new exact dimensionless solution for the piston trajectory is obtained, and a solution in the simple wave region, for which new estimates of applicability limits are obtained. The wave motion of a gas is described with the numerical solution of gas dynamics dimensionless equations on a moving mesh. We analyze the working areas of approximate analytical solutions comparing the latter with the numerical solutions. Furthermore, we demonstrate the calculation of a model example, which compares the results of calculations for various models and estimates the variation range in dimensionless parameters from the point of view of practical application. The dimensionless representation of the solutions allows us to summarize the results obtained. Based on the efficiency analysis, we deal with the issue of energy performance of piston acceleration by compressed gas. Findings of research show that with an increase in the length of the pipe and the ratio between the mass of compressed gas and the mass of the piston, the efficiency decreases


References
[1] Seiler F., Igra O., ed. Hypervelocity Launchers. Springer, 2016, 300 p.
[2] Zlatin N.A., Krasilschikov A.P., Mishin G.I., Popov N.N. Ballisticheskie ustanovki i ikh primenenie v eksperimentalnykh issledovaniyakh [Ballistic ranges and their application in experimental research]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1974, 344 p.
[3] Pavlenko A.V., Balabin S.I., Kozelkov O.E., Kazakov D.N. Pribory i tekhnika eksperimenta [Instruments and Experimental Techniques], 2013, no. 56 (4), pp. 482–484.
[4] Jones D.R., Chapman D.J., Eakins D.E. A gas gun based technique for studying the role of temperature in dynamic fracture and fragmentation. J. Appl. Phys., 2013, vol. 114, p. 173508.
[5] Horák V., Do Duc L., Vítek R., Beer S., Mai Q.H. Prediction of the Air Gun Performance. Advances in Military Technology, 2014, vol. 9 (1), pp. 31–44.
[6] Grigor’ev V.V., Isakov S.N., Petrov R.L., Yurkin S.V. Zhurnal tekhnicheskoy fiziki [Technical Physics. The Russian Journal of Applied Physics], 2006, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 367 372.
[7] Johnston A., Krishnamoorthy L.V. A Numerical Simulation of Gas Gun Performance. Defence Science and Technology Organisation, 2008, DSTO-TN-080.
[8] Plassard F., Mespoulet J., Hereil P. Analysis of a single stage compressed gas launcher behaviour: from breech opening to sabot separation. 8th European LS-DYNA Users Conference, 2011, vol. 8, pp. 1–11.
[9] Moradi A., Ahmadikia H. One-Dimensional and Axisymmetric Numerical Simulation of a Single-Stage Gas Gun. Adv. Theor. Appl. Mech., 2011, vol. 4 (3), pp. 101–111.
[10] Moradi A., Khodadadiyan S. Study of Real Gas Behaviour in a Single-Stage Gas Gun. Int. J. of Mechanical and Mechatronics Eng., 2011, vol. 5 (6), pp. 948–952.
[11] Seigel A.E. The theory of high speed guns. NATO AGARD, 314 p.
[12] Gardiner P.A., Egawa Y., Watanabe K. Performance evaluation of single stage diaphragmless vertical gas gun for nitrogen and helium gas propellants. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2016, vol. 3 (6), pp. 16–00273.
[13] Denny M. Gas gun dynamics. Eur. J. Phys., 2013, vol. 34, pp. 1327–1336.
[14] Luo H., Baum J.D., Lőhner R. On the computation of multi-material flows using ALE formulation. J. of Comp. Phys., 2004, vol. 194, pp. 304–328.