14 / 15
А.Г. Андреев, Г.В. Казаков, В.В. Корянов
14
Инженерный журнал: наука и инновации
# 6·2016
Approach and methods for estimating
the informative stability coefficient of aircraft flight
automated control system
© A.G. Andreev
1
, G.V. Kazakov
1
, V.V. Koryanov
2
1
Federal State Budgetary Institution 4th Central Research Institute of the Ministry
of Defense of the Russian Federation, Korolev, Moscow region, 141091, Russia
2
Bauman Moscow State Technical University, Moscow, 105005, Russia
The article demonstrates a technical approach to estimation of the informative stability
coefficient of the aircraft flight automated control system basing on the analytic hierar-
chy process. The developed approach makes it possible to evaluate the coefficient of such
significant feature as the informative safety of the aircraft flight automated control sys-
tem and the coefficient of the informational stability integral property of the aircraft
flight automated control system in the most accurate and simplest way. The main idea of
the proposed approach includes step-by-step main characteristics priority definition us-
ing the analytic hierarchy process. We estimate the coefficients values for the character-
istics at the bottom of the hierarchy as far as the last are considered to be the most
understandable and simplest. Therefore, that allows experts to easily evaluate their coef-
ficients using the analytic hierarchy process.
Keywords:
hypothesis, control, aircraft, reliability, data preparation, software.
REFERENCES
[1]
Saati T.L.
Prinyatiye resheniy pri zavisimosti i obratnykh szyazyakh: Analitich-
eskiye seti
[Decision making about relationship and back-coupling: Analytical
nets]. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008, 360 p.
[2]
Saati T.L.
Matematicheskiye modeli konfliktnykh situatsyy
[Mathematical mod-
els of conflict situations]. Moscow, Sovetskoye radio, 1977, 304 p.
[3]
Saati T.L.
Prinyatiye resheniy. Metod analiza iyerarkhiy
[Decision making.
Analytic hierarchy process]. Moscow, Radio i svyaz, 1993, 278 p.
[4]
Vargas L.
Sensitivity Analysis of Reciprocal Matrices
, Chapter 3 in Ph.D. dis-
sertation. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, 1978.
[5]
Rukovodyaschiy document FSTEK. Avtomatizirovannyye sistemy. Zaschita ot
nesanktsionnirovannogo dostupa k informatsii. Klassificatsiya avtomatiziro-
vannykh sistem i trebovaniya po zaschite informatsii.
Available at:
http://fstec.ru/normotvorcheskaya/poisk-po-dokumentam/114-tekhnicheskaya-zashchita-informatsii/dokumenty/spetsialnye-normativnye-dokumenty/384-
rukovodyashchij-dokument-reshenie-predsedatelya-gostekhkomissii-rossii-ot-
30-marta-1992-g (accessed May 10, 2016).
[6]
Buslenko N.P.
Lektsii po teorii sloghnykh sistem
[Lectures of complicated sys-
tems theory]. Moscow, Sovetskoye radio, 1973, 438 p.
[7]
Volik B.G.
Metody analiza i sinteza struktur upravlyayuschikh sistem
[Methods
of analysis and control systems structures synthesis]. Moscow, Energoatomiz-
dat, 1988, 296 p.
[8]
Mesarovich M, Mako D., Takakhara I.
Teoriya iyerarkhicheskikh mnogourov-
nevykh sistem
[Theory of hierarchical multilevel systems]. Moscow, Mir Publ.,
1973, 344 p.
[9]
Kulba V.V., Shevtsov A.R.
Avtomatika i telemekhanika — Automation and
Remote Control
, 1994, no. 8, pp .154–164.