Certain conclusions on results of introducing the reliability design and technological analysisin rocket and space production. Part 1

Article

Published: 23.08.2023

Published in issue: #8(140)/2023

DOI: 10.18698/2308-6033-2023-8-2297

Category: Aviation and Rocket-Space Engineering | Chapter: Design, construction and production of aircraft

The paper summons typical errors of designers, their misconceptions and miscalculations (hereinafter referred to as the errors) in design and development of the rocket and space products, which were identified in analyzing design and technological documentation using a new method of reliability design and technological analysis. Analyzes were carried out in the mode of external examinations and testing by designers of their proprietary developments. Errors identified during the analysis are typical for the modern quality control systems with the normative and technical documentation in force in the rocket and space industry to ensure quality and reliability. Taking into account even those errors indicated in the paper could significantly increase efficiency of the design work and reduce the number of failures in the rocket and space products. However, they are far from exhaustive. Identifying the most complete list of errors in design and technological documentation requires the mandatory reliability design and technological analysis in development of new and modified products.

References
[1] Pokhabov Yu.P. Teoriya i praktika obespecheniya nadyezhnosti mekhanicheskikh ustroystv odnorazovogo srabatyvaniya [Theory and practice of ensuring the need for mechanical devices of one-time operation]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Publ. 2018, 338 p.
[2] Hecht H., Hecht M. Reliability prediction for spacecraft. Report prepared for Rome Air Development Center: no. RADC-TR-85-229, 1985, 156 р.
[3] Saleh J.H., Caster J.-F. Reliability and Multi-State Failures: A Statistical Approach. NJ, John Wiley & Sons, 2011, 206 р.
[4] Reason J. Human Error. Cambridge University Press, 1990, 302 р.
[5] Komarov V.A. Tochnoe proektirovanie [Concurrent design]. Ontologiya proektirovaniya — Ontology of Designing, 2012, no. 3, pp. 8–23.
[6] Pokhabov Yu.P. Proektirovanie vysokootvetstvennykh sistem s uchetom nadezhnosti na primere povorotnoy shtangi [Design for reliability highly responsible systems on the example of a moving rod]. Zhurnal SFU. Tekhnika tekhnologii — Journal of Siberian Federal University. Engineering & Technologies, 2019, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 861–883.
[7] Pokhabov Yu.P. Metod proektirovaniya i konstruirovaniya mekhanizmov kosmicheskogo naznacheniya s zadannoy nadezhnostyu [Method for designing and developing space mechanisms with specified dependability]. Nadezhnost —Dependability, 2023, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 26–38.
[8] Pokhabov Yu.P. Konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskiy analiz nadezhnosti [Dependability design and technological analysis]. Krasnoyarsk, 2022, SFU Publ. Available at: https://elib.sfu-kras.ru/handle/2311/145578?show=full&ysclid=la7xc81kmz225201519 (accessed February 20, 2023).
[9] Pokhabov Yu.P. Analiz i otsenka nadezhnosti vysokootvetstvennykh tekhnicheskikh sistem edinichnogo proizvodstva [Analysis and reliability assessment of high-responsible technical systems of unit production]. Vestnik mashinostroeniya — Russian Engineering Research, 2019, no. 10, pp. 7–12.
[10] Gorn I.A., Ivantsov N.Yu., Skryabin V.V., et al. O rezultatakh provedeniya analiza nadezhnosti mekhanicheskikh ustroystv raskrytiya paneley solnechnykh batarey MKA NT-100 [On the results of the analysis of the reliability of mechanical devices for opening solar panels MKA NT-100]. In: Reshetnevskiye chteniya (9–12 noyabrya 2016, Krasnoyarsk) [Reshetnev readings (November 9–12, 2016, Krasnoyarsk)]. Krasnoyarsk, 2016, part 1, pp. 620–621.
[11] Pokhabov Yu.P., Kaverin V.A., Belov M.V., et al. Rezultaty konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskogo analiza nadezhnosti tolkatelya golovnogo obtekatelya [Results of reliability design and technological analysis of the nose fairing pusher]. Inzhenerny zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2023, iss. 5. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2023-5-2273
[12] Dubovikov B.A. Osnovy nauchnoy organizatsii upravleniem kachestva (opyt primeneniya i teoreticheskie obosnovaniya sistemy organizatsii bezdefektnogo truda) [Fundamentals of the scientific organization of quality management (experience in the application and theoretical justification of the system for organizing defect-free labor)]. Moscow, Ekonomika Publ., 1966, 321 p.
[13] Seifi I.F., Yaroshenko A.I., Bakaev V.I. Sistema KANARSPI. Garantiya vysokogo kachestva [CANARSPY system. High quality guarantee]. Moscow, Standart Publ., 1968, 149 p.
[14] Gorokhova V.V. Primeneniye Saratovskoy sistemy pri provedenii issledovatelskikh i konstruktorskikh rabot [Application of the Saratov system in research and design work]. Moscow, Standart Publ., 1969, 105 p.
[15] Pokhabov Yu.P., Tochilov L.S. Puti proektirovaniya nadezhnoy otechestvennoy raketno-kosmicheskoy tekhniki v izmenyayuschikhsya usloviyakh [Approaches to designing reliable domestic rocket and space equipment under changing conditions]. Inzhenerny zhurnal: nauka i innovatsii — Engineering Journal: Science and Innovation, 2022, iss. 6. https://doi.org/10.18698/2308-6033-2022-6-2184
[16] Venikov G.V. Proektirovanie i nadezhnost [Design and reliability]. Moscow, Znanie Publ., 1971, 96 p.
[17] Kernozhitsky V.A., Sannikov V.A., Ledovoy I.A. Nadezhnost organizatsionno-tekhnicheskikh sistem i ikh elementov [Reliability of organizational and technical systems and their elements]. St. Petersburg, BGTU Publ., 2011, 321 p.
[18] Van-Zhelen V. Fizicheskaya teoriya nadezhnosti [Physical theory of reliability]. Simferopol, 1998, 318 p.
[19] Bolotin V.V. Teoriya nadezhnosti mekhanicheskikh sistem s konechnym chislom stepeney svobody [Reliability theory of mechanical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom]. Izvestiya AN SSSR. Mekhanika tverdogo tela — Mechanics of Solids. A Journal of Russian Academy of Sciences, 1969, no. 5, pp. 74–81.
[20] Gnedenko B.V., Belyaev Yu.K., Solovyov A.D. Matematicheskie metody v teorii nadezhnosti. Osnovnye kharakteristiki nadezhnosti i ikh statisticheskiy analiz [Mathematical methods in reliability theory. The main characteristics of reliability and their statistical analysis]. Moscow, Nauka Publ, 1965, 524 p.
[21] Pokhabov Yu.P. Nadezhnost: vzglyad konstruktora [Reliability: designer’s view]. Nadezhnost — Dependability, 2020, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 13–20.
[22] Belov A.V., Boreisho A.S., Morozov A.V., et al. Proektirovanie i nadezhnost lazernykh kompleksov spetsialnogo naznacheniya [Design and reliability of laser complexes for special purposes]. St. Petersburg, BGTU Publ., 2014, 347 p.